2025-09-29 – Weekly Architecture News : RFPs are changing fast on carbon

Last week, our community engaged in a variety of discussions ranging from practical tips to industry trends. Members shared experiences on how they evaluate product substitutions in project specifications, emphasizing the importance of maintaining quality and compliance. There was also a lively debate on the evolving nature of RFPs with a focus on carbon reduction, highlighting the growing emphasis on sustainability in architectural practice. Additionally, members discussed strategies to keep FF&E/lighting schedules on track, exchanging useful project management insights.


This Week’s Hot Topics

How I vet product substitutions in specs
A deep dive into methods for vetting product substitutions, ensuring they meet project requirements without compromising quality.
Read more here

2025-09-25 – Weekly Architecture Jobs : Explore remote architecture roles
This week’s job roundup features a range of remote opportunities, reflecting the growing trend towards flexible work arrangements in the field.
Read more here

Power-washing the Renaissance off
A provocative discussion on modern interventions in historical architecture, questioning the balance between preservation and innovation.
Read more here

RFPs are changing fast on carbon
Explore how the architecture industry is rapidly adapting to new carbon reduction mandates in RFPs, a critical trend for future projects.
Read more here

One tweak that kept our FF&E/lighting on schedule
Find out about a simple yet effective adjustment that helped keep project timelines on track, shared by a fellow member.
Read more here

What Are the Best Online Courses for Aspiring Architects?
An informative thread for those looking to expand their skills through online education, featuring member recommendations and reviews.
Read more here

FAQ/Guidelines
Essential reading for understanding how to navigate and contribute effectively to our community discussions.
Read more here

Admin Guide: Getting Started
A helpful resource for new members looking to make the most of their experience on the forum.
Read more here

Thinking About a Career in Architecture? Here’s What You Need to Know!
An insightful exploration of what it takes to succeed in the field of architecture, from education to career progression.
Read more here


Thank you for staying engaged with our community. Your contributions and discussions continue to make this a valuable space for all. Looking forward to the conversations next week.

And on recent RFPs we’ve started attaching a one-page “carbon criteria” sheet that sets max GWP per assembly and requires third‑party EPDs, with an EC3 snapshot for baseline vs target (EC3). It’s cut down substitution debates a ton, though @Marcus we’ve learned to add regional alternates so the GWP cap doesn’t box out available stock. Think of it like a spec appendix that keeps the carbon budget from wandering like a site visit on a Friday afternoon.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‍​‌‌⁠⁠​⁠​‍‌​⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‌‌‍‌‍‍​‌⁠​‌​⁠‍​‌‍‍‍‌​⁠‍‌⁠‌‍‌⁠‍​‌‌‌‍‌​⁠​‌‍⁠‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

At 50% DD we require an EC3 snapshot EC3; caveat: accept temporary industry-average EPDs for rural suppliers.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‌​‌‍⁠‍‌‌‍‌‌‌​⁠​⁠​​‌‌‍​‌​‍​‌​​⁠‌‌‍‌‌‍⁠​​⁠‍​​⁠‍​‌‌​⁠‌‌​​‌‍​‍‌​​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

We’ve started adding a bid-form line that asks for a priced lower‑carbon option per major assembly, with a GWP target we set and the product‑specific EPD due at submittal. “accept temporary industry-average EPDs for rural suppliers.” is fine for bid day, but we make award contingent on a plant‑specific EPD within 30 days so the average doesn’t stick — anyone else enforce a deadline?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‍​‌‍‍⁠‌‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌⁠‍‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍⁠‌‌⁠‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‌​⁠‌​‍⁠​⁠‍‌‌‍‍​‌​‌⁠‌‍‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

We cap a 3% “carbon premium” in RFPs; require a Tally report — alternatively accept an EPD-in-progress letter, @Guide.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​​​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‍‌‌​‍‍‌‌‌‌‌​‌⁠‌‌‍‍‌⁠‍‌‌⁠‌‍‌​⁠‍‌⁠​​‌‍‍​‌⁠‌‌‌‌​⁠‌‌‌⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

We add ‘refrigerant GWP and charge’ to MEP RFPs; tiny effort, big impact; watch for legacy stock.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‍‍​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​⁠‌‍‍⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‌⁠‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌‍​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍‌⁠‍‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‍‌‌​​‌‌‌​⁠‌​‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌​⁠‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​